The 50% Solution

A saying attributed to the famous Philadelphia retailer John Wanamaker is that, “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half.” Apparently, that saying can be updated for the Internet age to read, “Half the traffic to my website is non-human; the trouble is I don't know which half.”

In fact, the percentage is worse than that. According to a study by online researcher Imperva, a whopping 61.5% of traffic on the web is non-human. What do we mean by non-human? Well, it’s a category that include search engines, software that’s scraping your website, hackers, spammers and others who are up to no good.

And yes, it gets worse. The lower the traffic to your website, the greater the percentage that is likely to be non-human. Indeed, if your site gets 1,000 of fewer visits per day, the study suggests that as much as 80% of your traffic may be non-human.

Sure, a lot of this non-human traffic is search engines (and you’d be amazed how many there still are out there), and that’s probably a good thing. After all, we want exposure. But the rest of this traffic is more dubious. About 5% of your overall site traffic is likely to be scrapers -- –people using software to grab all the content on your site, for purposes benign or evil. Sure, they can’t get to your password protected content, but if you publish any amount of free data on your site in structured form, chances are that others now have that data in their databases.

Obviously, if your sell online advertising, these statistics represent an inconvenient truth. The only saving grace is that your competitors are in the same boat. But if you are a subscription site, does any of this even matter?

I think it does. Because all this non-human activity distorts all of our web analytics in addition to our overall visitor counts. Half the numbers we see are not real. These non-human visitors could lead you to believe certain pages are more popular on your site than the really are; this could cause you to use bad insights to fashion your marketing strategy. And if you are using paid search to generate traffic, you could be getting similarly bad marketing data, and paying for the privilege as well.

Most importantly, this non-human traffic distorts reality. If you’re beating yourself up because of low response, lead generation or order rates, especially given the number of uniques and page views you appear to be getting, start by dividing by two. Do your numbers suddenly look a lot better? Bots and scrapers and search engines don’t request demos, don’t download white pages and certainly don’t buy merchandise. Keep that in mind next time you’re looking at your site analytics reports or puzzling why some pages on your site get so much more attention than others. Remember, not all data are good data.

Looks Matter

You’ve probably heard of a company called Square: it manufactures a doo-dad that attached to your mobile phone or tablet that allows small merchants to accept credit cards. Well, Square went public yesterday, and the stock popped nicely, earning the six year old company a market valuation of $2.9 billion. That’s an exciting story in and of itself, but what really jumped out at me was a comment made yesterday by Jack Dorsey, Square’s founder. He said, “We’re not going out there to say we’re getting rid of the banks or card networks. We’ve just put a much cleaner face on that infrastructure.”

Yes, this young company with the multi-billion dollar valuation sees itself, in effect, as a user interface company. Square isn’t trying to disrupt the existing payments networks. It is simply trying to make them more easily accessible.

Certainly, most data publishers are well aware of the importance of the user interface and the overall user experience. But here’s a stunning example of a company that has built its entire business on providing a simpler, easier customer experience.

Thinking about Square this way made me realize it is not an isolated case. Another company that caught my eye recently, called HoneyInsured, seeks to take on an even bigger challenge. HoneyInsured is a front-end to the healthcare.gov site where consumers seek to select insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act. Think back to all the horror stories around the launch of healthcare.gov and then consider HoneyInsured’s claim: it can identify the best health plan for you if you answer just four simple questions. A complex process becomes simplicity itself.

While all of this is very cool and cutting edge, it’s really not all that new. Think of the number of services (e.g., EDGAR Online) that sprung up to put user-friendly interfaces on the SEC EDGAR database – while EDGAR was completely free to use, these services proved that lots of people would pay for smarter, simpler and easier access.

As the data market evolves, we are increasingly seeing that the interface and the overall user experience matter almost as much as the data itself. The rapid shift to mobile devices has forced data providers to simplify and often dumb down their products to provide an adequate experience on these small screens. And the larger trend of users not having the inclination to read (either your user manual or the content itself) is also forcing content companies to simplify their interfaces. And that’s no small challenge when users are simultaneously screaming for both simplicity and more powerful analytics.

The bottom line is that data presentation matters … a lot. Your user interface can become a prime sales benefit, or a critical competitive weakness. We’ve certainly seen examples of market incumbents being challenged by upstart competitors with largely the same data but much better and fresher presentation and ease of use.

Having great data is now a minimum requirement. Putting tools and analytics around your data is the current battleground. But we’re quickly seeing that the next one will be the presentation layer – the “last mile” problem of translating your data and tools into something users can engage with easily and immediately, and make sense of just as easily. Are you giving your user interface the attention it deserves?

Bad Data, Specious Claim

The U.S. Supreme Court began to hear arguments this week on a case called Spokeo Inc. vs. Robins. The case hasn’t gotten too much attention, but for data publishers, the outcome could be profound.

The plaintiff in this case, Thomas Robins, claims that Spokeo, one of the larger online consumer data aggregators, damaged his reputation by disseminating incorrect information about him. According to published accounts, the record Spokeo had on Robins was a real botch job – almost everything was wrong. Ironically, a lot of the information was wrong in a good way: Spokeo tagged him as wealthy even though he was unemployed, gave him a wife and even awarded him a graduate degree he didn’t have. But wrong data is wrong data, according to Robins.

Here’s the part that gets weird, subtle and scary. Robins can’t point to any specific example of how he was damaged by this bad information. And courts don’t like awarding damages when damages can’t be shown. That’s why Robins is suing under a provision of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which does let consumers claim damages if false information about them is distributed. As Robins sees it, even though he can’t prove he was damaged, he’s still entitled to damages because the information was supposed to be correct and it wasn’t. Starting to feel a chill going down your spine? Well, it gets even scarier when you realize there are quite a few laws relating to consumer and professional information like this on the books. And while the maximum penalty under the Fair Credit Reporting Act isn’t huge – just $1,000 – this is the stuff of dreams for class action lawyers, who can sue on behalf of millions of individuals, with a maximum penalty of $1,000 each.

 If Robins prevails, the information industry will become a happy hunting ground for lawyers who can use these so-called statutory penalties to take data companies to court for a broad range of practices, even if nobody was damaged by them. Business data may be a safer place to be right now, but with the increased blurring of our business and personal lives, the safety could easily be undone by a creative lawyer somewhere.

The Robins case won’t be decided until 2016, but it’s one to monitor carefully. A lot of big players in the information industry are already monitoring it … very nervously.

2015 Models of Excellence: Bucking the Disruption Trend

With the deadline for the Business Information & Media Summit fast approaching, here are four excellent reasons to look forward to your trip to Ft. Lauderdale (or to sign up if you haven’t already).

Trucker Path – Trucker Path is laudable from several perspectives. First, it developed a useful, much-needed and very successful app for truckers to use to find gas, food and even rest stops while on the road. It’s all neatly executed, utilizing GPS to pinpoint the nearest amenities, crowdsourced data and even user reviews. Even the advertising in the app is driven by proximity to the advertiser. This would be a nice business in itself, but Trucker Path has gone further. Leveraging the 300,000 users of its app, it is now launching a matching service to connect truckers to those who have freight that needs to be shipped. Marketplaces like this can be tough to launch, but Trucker Path took its time, and built not only a loyal following, but a trusted neutral brand, all key elements to succeeding with a new industry marketplace. All of this hard work is driving it towards a billion dollar valuation.

Parking Panda – Parking Panda was originally envisioned as sort of an Airbnb for parking spaces. If you lived near a stadium, for example, and wanted to rent your driveway, Parking Panda would connect you to those looking for parking.

The concept has evolved quite a bit since then. Parking Panda has now allied itself primary with parking garage operators, an industry badly in need of a technological assist. Now a consumer can specify a destination, and Parking Panda will identify available parking garages – all with guaranteed availability – provide rates and allow for online booking. Increasingly, Parking Panda users are even able to enter and leave the parking facility using only the Parking Panda app.

For garage operators, there’s also a payoff. They get greater operational productivity, a way to market themselves to better sell available inventory, the ability to vary prices in real time to respond to demand, and powerful customer analytics tools. High profile partners the Horseshoe Casino Baltimore, Tampa Bay Rays, and the Washington Nationals.

PeopleTicker – PeopleTicker is a classic, ground-up data play. Numerous systems already exist to help companies compare and benchmark full-time jobs to help them select the correct salary level. But what about the burgeoning contingent or “gig” economy? PeopleTicker saw a need to develop comparable benchmarking tools. It now draws on feeds of data supplied by major employers, augmented by web harvesting and other data sources, to build this unique dataset. Moreover, it’s made a significant investment to build more precision around job descriptions for greater comparability.

Quorum – Quorum is a data analytics company founded by two Harvard school buddies who went from mapping proteins to mapping relationships between members of Congress. Barely a year old, this startup is an online legislative strategy platform that provides legislative professionals access to the world’s most comprehensive database of legislative information, unique quantitative insights, and modern project management tools. With Quorum, users can easily search, save, comment on, and receive email alerts for all bills, votes, tweets, press releases, floor statements, caucuses, committees, and staff contact information from the U.S. Congress and all 50 state legislatures.

Quorum’s advanced quantitative analytics provide information on each legislator’s top issues, most frequent collaborators, ideology, voting history, and legislative effectiveness. By enabling users to easily log meetings, clearly highlight differences between bills, create legislative spreadsheets, and quickly email multiple legislators and congressional staff, Quorum’s productivity features save users valuable time.

Quorum’s comprehensive data, quantitative insights, and 21st-century productivity tools are changing the way people track legislation, build support, and take action – and it just might change the Beltway’s influence peddling industry for the better.

Bucking the Trend

As with all of our Models of Excellence, these are clearly all very different businesses. But all four are trying in different ways to enhance the efficiency of the markets they serve. In the case of Parking Panda and Trucker Path, their solution was to actually build online marketplaces. For PeopleTicker, it’s putting information infrastructure in place to make the market run more efficiently. With Quorum, the goal is to help organize and manage the process of creating and influencing legislation.

Perhaps more significantly, all four companies didn’t feel they had to disrupt their markets to make a place for themselves. Trucker Path’s new marketplace doesn’t try to cut out the freight brokers; indeed, it welcomes their participation. Parking Panda isn’t trying to find an alternative to parking garages; it’s helping that industry operate more conveniently and efficiently. And PeopleTicker didn’t try to become a recruiter or job site; it simply provides the critical data needed to make the existing market more efficient. What we see with Quorum is a sophisticated effort to organize a complex and unwieldy process for the benefit of those working in that industry. So while disruption is all the rage these days, there are still plenty of strong opportunities to bring what I call “innovation overlays” to markets.

You’ll have the unique opportunity to learn from the innovators behind these fascinating companies at BIMS 2015 in Ft. Lauderdale, See you there!

Say What You Want!

A bill has recently been introduced in the U.S. Senate (S.2044) called the Consumer Review Freedom Act. Its core provision outlaws non-disparagement clauses for online reviews.

What are non-disparagement clauses? Increasingly, businesses are writing into their terms of sale language that prohibits their customers from posting unfavorable reviews about them online, often subjecting them to stiff penalties if they do.

There’s a need for this bill as non-disparagement clauses are rapidly getting out of hand. Interestingly, they first took hold in the healthcare profession, where physicians bridled at the notion of mere patients commenting on how they do business. Such clauses also briefly got some traction in the hotel industry, where hotels sought to fight back against the overwhelming power of sites such as TripAdvisor. It’s also been noted that non-disparagement clauses can even be found in the terms of use of more than a few websites. Merely by accessing these websites, you are prohibited from posting negative reviews. You may also be prohibited from making negative comments to friends and neighbors!

While most people see their online reviews as a simple freedom of speech issue, non-disparagement clauses can lead people to worry that perhaps their online reviews are not protected speech. It’s this potential chilling effect that this legislation seeks to end.

I certainly have sympathy for small businesses that have been subjected to unfair, inaccurate and mean-spirited reviews. Yet at the same time, resorting to non-disparagement clauses is a heavy-handed and clumsy response. Moreover, they have incredibly bad optics, something a number of businesses have learned when they tried to enforce this legal language and the dispute got picked up by the media.

This proposed legislation isn’t the last word in terms of the law of online reviews. Further balancing is needed. But as a way to make it clear to consumers that they are free to post their opinions online, it’s a positive development.